2026-10-19 - LD Brussels - Barco v. Yealink Network Technology - UPC-CFI-0000185/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0000185/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Barco N.V. v. Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology Co. Ltd., Yealink (Europe) Network Technology B.V.

Kernaussage: The Brussels LD judge-rapporteur closed the interim procedure and confirmed the oral hearing date after the Court of Appeal, on 16 October 2026, upheld the division's order refusing the patentee leave to amend the patent under R.

2026-10-19 - LD Brussels - Barco v. Yealink Network Technology - UPC-CFI-0000185/2026
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_806/2025 Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC-CFI-0000185/2026 (Sie lesen diesen hier)
🏛️Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division• Order
📅2026-10-19
🔢UPC-CFI-0000185/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Barco N.V.
Christian DEKONINCK
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology Co. Ltd.
Yealink (Europe) Network Technology B.V.
Ruud VAN DER VELDEN
⚖️Counterclaim for revocation
🌐English

routine
The Brussels LD judge-rapporteur closed the interim procedure and confirmed the oral hearing date after the Court of Appeal, on 16 October 2026, upheld the division's order refusing the patentee leave to amend the patent under R. 30.2 and R. 263 RoP, so that the late auxiliary request is not part of the proceedings and no further written pleadings are needed. The order applied the contingency mechanism of the first interim-conference order, which had tied the hearing date to the timing and outcome of the appeal. It also corrected a material mistake in the earlier pleading timetable and set guideline speaking times, with 30–45 minutes for the parties to restructure their pleadings if the Court gives a preliminary non-binding opinion. The values in dispute of EUR 1 million for the infringement action and EUR 1.5 million for the counterclaim were restated.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren