2026-09-21 - LD Düsseldorf - Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v. Meta - UPC-CFI-0002051/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0002051/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v. Meta Platforms, Inc., Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC., Meta Platforms Technologies Ireland Limited, Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, Facebook Germany GmbH, Facebook France Sarl, Facebook Netherlands B.V., Facebook Italy S.R.L., Facebook Denmark ApS

Kernaussage: The Düsseldorf Local Division resumed proceedings it had stayed at the parties' joint request, permitted the mutually consented withdrawals of an infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation under R.

2026-09-21 - LD Düsseldorf - Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v. Meta - UPC-CFI-0002051/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-09-21
🔢UPC-CFI-0002051/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
Tobias J. HESSEL
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC.
Meta Platforms Technologies Ireland Limited
Meta Platforms Ireland Limited
Facebook Germany GmbH
Facebook France Sarl
Facebook Netherlands B.V.
Facebook Italy S.R.L.
Facebook Denmark ApS
Steffen Elmar STEININGER
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐English

notable
The Düsseldorf Local Division resumed proceedings it had stayed at the parties' joint request, permitted the mutually consented withdrawals of an infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation under R. 265.2(a) RoP, and closed the proceedings. No cost decision was made because neither party requested reimbursement of costs, following the Court of Appeal in DexCom v Abbott. On court fees, the claimant sought 60% reimbursement under the pre-2026 wording of R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP because its action was filed in 2025; the Court instead applied the current wording and ordered 50%, holding that the date of the withdrawal and reimbursement application, not the filing date of the action, determines which version applies, following the Court of Appeal in Black Sheep v HL Display. The value of each action was set at EUR 1,000,000.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren