2026-09-17 - LD Munich - OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES v. MGI TECH et al. - UPC-CFI-0002307/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0002307/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Final Order
Parteien:
OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES PLC v. MGI TECH GmbH, MGI TECH CO., LIMITED, BGI HANGZHOU CYCLONESEQ TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, SHENZHEN BGI GENOMICS CO., LTD

Kernaussage: The Munich Local Division granted provisional measures against the German subsidiary of a group whose other members manufacture and distribute a competing nanopore sequencing platform, and extended the injunction to four states outside the UPC system on a long-arm basis.

2026-09-17 - LD Munich - OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES v. MGI TECH et al. - UPC-CFI-0002307/2026
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Final Order
📅2026-09-17
🔢UPC-CFI-0002307/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Marianne SCHAFFNER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
MGI TECH GmbH
MGI TECH CO., LIMITED
BGI HANGZHOU CYCLONESEQ TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
SHENZHEN BGI GENOMICS CO., LTD
Stephan NEUHAUS
⚖️Application for provisional measures
🌐English

landmark
The Munich Local Division granted provisional measures against the German subsidiary of a group whose other members manufacture and distribute a competing nanopore sequencing platform, and extended the injunction to four states outside the UPC system on a long-arm basis. Both patents were held more likely valid than invalid: the obviousness attacks on the first patent relied on hindsight because none of the cited documents recognised the problem of stochastic sensor failure, and the second patent was neither anticipated nor obvious because the prior art taught away from coupling the analyte away from the detector. On infringement, the Court applied R. 171.2 RoP strictly: contesting a statement of fact with ignorance is not specific contesting, a manufacturer or importer may not dispute infringement with ignorance at all, and where the claim feature is a negative fact the respondent carries a secondary burden to offer a technically plausible explanation. Acts of the three foreign respondents were attributed to the German respondent by common design, and necessity followed from the destruction of a one-player market and the danger of price erosion. Service on the foreign respondents under the Hague Convention had failed, so the Court separated the proceedings against them rather than deciding on alternative service, which needs an application.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren