2026-08-27 - CD Munich - Sypox v. Topsoe - UPC-CFI-0000894/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0000894/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section
Art:
Order
Parteien:
SYPOX GmbH v. Topsoe A/S

Kernaussage: The judge-rapporteur of the Munich Central Division held that veto rights held by a 10% minority investor over reserved corporate matters do not amount to a right to exercise dominant influence within Art.

2026-08-27 - CD Munich - Sypox v. Topsoe - UPC-CFI-0000894/2026
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section• Order
📅2026-08-27
🔢UPC-CFI-0000894/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
SYPOX GmbH
Andreas HOFMANN
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Topsoe A/S
Connor MCCONCHIE
⚖️Revocation Action
🌐English

notable
The judge-rapporteur of the Munich Central Division held that veto rights held by a 10% minority investor over reserved corporate matters do not amount to a right to exercise dominant influence within Art. 3(3) of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, so the investor is not a linked enterprise and its figures are not aggregated. The revocation claimant therefore qualifies as an SME under R. 370.8 RoP and the 50% court fee it had paid was adequate. The Court provisionally set the value of the proceedings at EUR 2,000,000, giving a recoverable-cost ceiling of EUR 200,000, and rejected the claimant's request to lower that ceiling because qualification as an SME is a relevant but not a sufficient factor and the asserted threat to its economic existence was unsubstantiated. The defendant's request for security for costs was likewise rejected: the applicant bears the burden of substantiation and proof, and the respondent's own assertion made in support of a cost-ceiling reduction does not by itself make out a credible case of a genuine risk to recoverability.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren