2026-08-26 - LD Mannheim - iCAT v. DENTSPLY SIRONA et al. - UPC-CFI-0001938/2026
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-CFI-0001938/2026
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- iCAT CORPORATION v. DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc., Dentsply Sirona Deutschland GmbH
Kernaussage: The judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismissed a preliminary objection as inadmissible because it raised none of the three matters R.
2026-08-26 - LD Mannheim - iCAT
v.
DENTSPLY SIRONA et al. - UPC-CFI-0001938/2026
routine
The judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismissed a preliminary objection as inadmissible because it raised none of the three matters R. 19.1 RoP permits. The defendants expressly accepted the Court's jurisdiction and competence and contended only that Art. 72 UPCA caps the period for which financial compensation may be sought, asking that the point be noted and decided in the main proceedings under R. 20.2 RoP. The Court held that R. 19.1 RoP allows a preliminary objection only as to the jurisdiction and competence of the Court, the competence of the division indicated by the claimant, and the language of the Statement of claim, and that an objection to the temporal scope of certain remedies refers to none of them. The order decides nothing about the limitation period itself.