2026-07-28 - CoA - Beko et al. v. Dolby - UPC-COA-0000078/2026

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-COA-0000078/2026
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Beko Germany GmbH, Arçelik A.Ş, Elektronik Plant v. Dolby International AB

Kernaussage: The judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal stayed two parallel appeals — one on the infringement action, one on the counterclaim for revocation — after the parties reported a settlement agreement and announced that they would withdraw their claims once the settlement obliga…

2026-07-28 - CoA - Beko et al. v. Dolby - UPC-COA-0000078/2026
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)• Order
📅2026-07-28
🔢UPC-COA-0000078/2026
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Beko Germany GmbH
Arçelik A.Ş, Elektronik Plant
Tilman PFRANG
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Dolby International AB
Volkmar HENKE
⚖️Appeal
🌐German

routine
The judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal stayed two parallel appeals — one on the infringement action, one on the counterclaim for revocation — after the parties reported a settlement agreement and announced that they would withdraw their claims once the settlement obligations were met. R. 295(d) RoP allows a stay at the joint request of the parties; the respondent applied and the appellants agreed, and the judge-rapporteur held the grounds valid. The order requires the parties to inform the Court once the settlement obligations are fulfilled and reserves each party's right to request resumption on reasoned application. The order is a case management order of the judge-rapporteur and is subject to panel review under R. 333.1 RoP.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren