2026-06-16 - LD Paris - Bostik v. Henkel France et al. - UPC_CFI_583/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_583/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Bostic, Inc. v. Henkel France, Henkel France Operations, Henkel technologies France, Henkel AG & Co KGaA, Henkel Nederland B.V, Henkel Italia S.r.l

Kernaussage: In a combined infringement action and revocation counterclaim over EP 1 725 627 (cold-seal cohesive coatings for flexible packaging), the Paris LD judge-rapporteur issued an interim-conference order under R.

2026-06-16 - LD Paris - Bostik v. Henkel France et al. - UPC_CFI_583/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division• Order
📅2026-06-16
🔢UPC_CFI_583/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC-CFI-0001435/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Bostik, Inc.
Gaëlle BOUROUT
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Henkel France
Henkel France Operations
Henkel Technologies France
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
Henkel Nederland B.V.
Henkel Italia
Marcus GROSCH
UPC_CFI_583/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Bostik, Inc.
Gaëlle BOUROUT
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Henkel France
Henkel France Operations
Henkel Technologies France
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
Henkel Nederland B.V.
Henkel Italia
Marcus GROSCH
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐English

routine
In a combined infringement action and revocation counterclaim over EP 1 725 627 (cold-seal cohesive coatings for flexible packaging), the Paris LD judge-rapporteur issued an interim-conference order under R. 105.5 RoP fixing the case for its 3 July 2026 oral hearing. The order records the agreed main legal issues (claim construction of the disputed features, validity attacks on added matter, insufficiency, novelty over D1 and prior use, and inventive step, plus jurisdiction over the Spanish/UK national parts and time-limitation), notes Bostik's partial withdrawal of the infringement claim as to two of the four accused products, and sets the case value at EUR 6 million (recoverable-cost ceiling EUR 600,000). Substantively, the JR defined the skilled person — an engineer in chemistry with physical-chemistry education and cold-seal-adhesive/flexible-packaging experience, not confined to the narrow field of the invention — and dismissed both parties' cross-applications to exclude late-filed arguments and exhibits, holding that the front-loaded system does not prevent a party from responding to, and further clarifying, arguments already raised, and that exhibits responding to the opponent's case (which could not have been anticipated at the pleading stage) are admissible.
Stichwörter
ENGLISH: R.105.5 RoP- Order following the interim conference.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren