2026-05-29 - LD Mannheim - Nokia v. Lotus Cars et al. - UPC_CFI_662/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_662/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
Nokia Solutions and Network Oy v. Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. and others

Kernaussage: The Mannheim Local Division allowed the mutually consented withdrawal of both Nokia's infringement action and the defendants' revocation counterclaim concerning EP 3 799 333 under Rule 265 RoP, declaring both proceedings closed.

2026-05-29 - LD Mannheim - Nokia v. Lotus Cars et al. - UPC_CFI_662/2025
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-05-29
🔢UPC_CFI_662/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC-CFI-0000160/2026
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Tim SMENTKOWSKI
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
Lynk & Co International AB
Lynk & Co Sales Germany GmbH
Lynk & Co Sales Netherlands B.V.
Lynk & Co Sales France SAS
Lynk & Co Sales Belgium SRL
Lynk & Co Sales Italy S.R.L.
Lynk & Co Sales Sweden AB
Zeekr EU B.V.
Zeekr Germany GmbH
Zeekr Sweden AB
Zeekr Danmark ApS
Lotus Technology Innovative Ltd.
Lotus Cars Europe B.V.
Lotus Cars Deutschland GmbH
Lotus Cars France SAS
Lotus Cars Belgium SRL/BV
Lotus Cars Österreich GmbH
Lotus Cars Danmark ApS
Lotus Cars Nederland B.V.
Lotus Cars Italia S.r.l.
Lotus Cars Sverige AB
smart Automobile Co. Ltd.
smart Europe GmbH
smart Austria Automotive GmbH
smart Belgium S.r.l.
smart Automobile France SAS
smart Nederland B.V.
smart Italia S.r.l.
smart Portugal Unipessoal Lda.
smart Sweden AB
Steffen Elmar STEININGER
UPC_CFI_662/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Tim SMENTKOWSKI
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
Lynk & Co International AB
Lynk & Co Sales Germany GmbH
Lynk & Co Sales Netherlands B.V.
Lynk & Co Sales France SAS
Lynk & Co Sales Belgium SRL
Lynk & Co Sales Italy S.R.L.
Lynk & Co Sales Sweden AB
Zeekr EU B.V.
Zeekr Germany GmbH
Zeekr Sweden AB
Zeekr Danmark ApS
Lotus Technology Innovative Ltd.
Lotus Cars Europe B.V.
Lotus Cars Deutschland GmbH
Lotus Cars France SAS
Lotus Cars Belgium SRL/BV
Lotus Cars Österreich GmbH
Lotus Cars Danmark ApS
Lotus Cars Nederland B.V.
Lotus Cars Italia S.r.l.
Lotus Cars Sverige AB
smart Automobile Co. Ltd.
smart Europe GmbH
smart Austria Automotive GmbH
smart Belgium S.r.l.
smart Automobile France SAS
smart Nederland B.V.
smart Italia S.r.l.
smart Portugal Unipessoal Lda.
smart Sweden AB
Steffen Elmar STEININGER
⚖️Infringement Action
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

notable
The Mannheim Local Division allowed the mutually consented withdrawal of both Nokia's infringement action and the defendants' revocation counterclaim concerning EP 3 799 333 under Rule 265 RoP, declaring both proceedings closed. Because both sides expressly declared they would make no costs applications, the court held that no costs decision was required, citing the Court of Appeal (UPC_CoA_808/2024). On the parties' fee-reimbursement requests, the court applied the amended Rule 370.9(b) RoP in force since 1 January 2026, holding — following the Court of Appeal in UPC_CoA_916/2025 (HUROM v NUC) — that the new version governs reimbursement applications filed after 31 December 2025 even where the withdrawn action was filed earlier. The result was reimbursement of only 50% of the paid court fees, rejecting the claimant's argument for the more generous pre-2026 rate.

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren