2026-05-13 - CoA - MediaTek et al. v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan - UPC-COA-0000053/2026
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-COA-0000053/2026
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (v. MediaTek) v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Kernaussage: The Court of Appeal (standing judge van den Broek) grants Huawei's request for a discretionary review under R.
2026-05-13 - CoA - MediaTek et al.
v.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan - UPC-COA-0000053/2026
notable
The Court of Appeal (standing judge van den Broek) grants Huawei's request for a discretionary review under R. 220.3 RoP of a Munich Local Division order that had confirmed a Reporter's grant of third-party file access to Quinn Emanuel under R. 262.1(b) RoP. The CoA holds that fundamental legal questions warrant review: (i) whether a Reporter's R. 262.1(b) decision is amenable to panel review under R. 333 RoP — on which the Munich LD and Paris LD have diverged — and (ii) which R. 220 RoP provision governs an appeal against such a decision. The order admits the appeal, assigns it to a panel, orders payment of the appeal-fee differential (€2,700), and invites further submissions on the R. 333 admissibility question. The grant of discretionary review is expressly without prejudice to the admissibility of the appeal under R. 220.2 ff. RoP, which the panel will decide.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).