2026-04-28 - LD Düsseldorf - Cup Cino Kaffeesystem Vertrieb v. Alpina Coffee Systems - UPC_CFI_47/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_47/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v. ALPINA Coffee Systems GmbH
Kernaussage: Companion case management order to UPC_CFI_52/2025 (EP 3 610 762), issued the same day by JR Thom under R.
2026-04-28 - LD Düsseldorf - Cup Cino Kaffeesystem Vertrieb
v.
Alpina Coffee Systems - UPC_CFI_47/2025
routine
Companion case management order to UPC_CFI_52/2025 (EP 3 610 762), issued the same day by JR Thom under R. 332 RoP in joined infringement (UPC_CFI_47/2025) and counterclaim revocation (UPC_CFI_68/2025) proceedings concerning EP 3 281 569. The JR articulated detailed pleading standards: a novelty attack is not substantiated by citing a document, inserting a figure, and adding bracketed citations after each feature (e.g. 'Fig. 1, p. 1, ll. 22-28') — the attacker must give a brief overview of the document and then explain feature-by-feature where the skilled person sees direct and unambiguous disclosure. Auxiliary requests must be presented in redline form with origin shown and individually substantiated; lumped pleading like 'auxiliary requests 2, 6, 10 and 14 contain feature X' is impermissible. The JR signaled that ~6 auxiliary requests may be an appropriate reference point and the equivalence request appears too indeterminate.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).