2026-04-28 - LD Düsseldorf - Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd., v. Zapp AG a.o. - UPC_CFI_869/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_869/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd., v. Zapp AG a.o.
Kernaussage: The Düsseldorf Local Division Judge-Rapporteur (Zhilova) deferred the claimant's R.
2026-04-28 - LD Düsseldorf - Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.,
v.
Zapp AG a.o. - UPC_CFI_869/2025
routine
The Düsseldorf Local Division Judge-Rapporteur (Zhilova) deferred the claimant's R. 9.2 RoP late-filing objection — directed at allegedly new factual material in the defendants' rejoinder to the amendment application — to the full panel, ruling that admissibility of evidence and argument is a substantive question outside the Judge-Rapporteur's case-management remit and properly decided in or after the oral hearing. Citing LD Mannheim in ZTE v Samsung (UPC_CFI_850/2024) and the Court of Appeal in OPPO v Panasonic (UPC_CoA_298-300/2024), she relied on R. 102.1 RoP to defer. To safeguard the principle of equality of arms, she nevertheless granted the claimant's R. 36 RoP precautionary request for a further written submission, with a three-week deadline (19 May 2026) and subsequent close of the written procedure.
Inoffiziell
Inoffizielle KI-Übersetzung
Dies ist eine automatische, von KI erstellte Übersetzung, die Fehler enthalten kann. Rechtsverbindlich ist allein das Originaldokument in der Verfahrenssprache (German).