2026-03-27 - LD Mannheim - Nokia v. Discovery Communications et al. - UPC-CFI-0001390/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC-CFI-0001390/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Decision
Parteien:
Nokia Technologies Oy v. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. and others

Kernaussage: Infringement action withdrawn with defendant's consent before close of written procedure.

2026-03-27 - LD Mannheim - Nokia v. Discovery Communications et al. - UPC-CFI-0001390/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Decision
📅2026-03-27
🔢UPC-CFI-0001390/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Nokia Technologies Oy
Julius WINKLER
Arno Eberhard RIßE
Tim SMENTKOWSKI
Jan WERGIN
Tuğçe ALTUN
Victoria THÜSING
Sophia Jiayi ZENG
Lars GRANNEMANN
Christoph WALKE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Dplay Entertainment Limited
Discovery Communications Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
Discovery Communications, LLC
HBO Nordic AB
HBO Europe s.r.o.
Discovery Communications Benelux B.V.
WarnerMedia Global Digital Services, LLC
Home Box Office, Inc.
Steffen Elmar STEININGER
⚖️Application Rop 265
🌐German
🤖🇬🇧

notable
Infringement action withdrawn with defendant's consent before close of written procedure. 60% fee reimbursement under old R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP. Key holding on transitional law: the amended fee rules (effective 1 January 2026) apply only to fee-triggering actions filed after that date. For pre-2026 actions, the old R. 370.9 applies even if the withdrawal application is filed in 2026 — the relevant trigger is the filing date of the fee-generating action, not the withdrawal. Expressly disagrees with Black Sheep v HL Display (CoA).

Inoffiziell

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren