2026-02-04 - CoA - Centripetal v. Palo Alto Networks - UPC-COA-0000891/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-COA-0000891/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Centripetal Limited v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Kernaussage: The CoA rejected Centripetal's appeal against the Mannheim LD's revocation of a Saisie (evidence preservation) Order.
2026-02-04 - CoA - Centripetal
v.
Palo Alto Networks - UPC-COA-0000891/2025
notable
The CoA rejected Centripetal's appeal against the Mannheim LD's revocation of a Saisie (evidence preservation) Order. Centripetal did not defend the original Saisie Order but sought to 'maintain' it in an amended form that broadened its scope — from location-specific inspection at Palo Alto's Munich office to location-independent document production with broader document categories. The court held this amended request inadmissible under R. 222.2 RoP because it constituted a new, broader request that should have been submitted at first instance. Centripetal failed to justify why it could not have made the amended request earlier. Since the original order was not defended and the amended request was inadmissible, the appeal was rejected.
Stichwörter
ENGLISH:
Appeal; application for preserving evidence and inspecting premises; admissibility; amended requests