2026-01-29 - CoA - EOFLOW v. Insulet - UPC-COA-0000930/2025
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC-COA-0000930/2025
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- EOFlow v. Insulet
Kernaussage: There is no implicit limitation on the use of information received as a result of the other party’s compliance with an order to communicate information pursuant to Art.
2026-01-29 - CoA - EOFLOW
v.
Insulet - UPC-COA-0000930/2025
There is no implicit limitation on the use of information received as a result of the other party’s compliance with an order to communicate information pursuant to Art. 67 UPCA and R. 191 RoP. It is necessary to file a confidentiality request with regard to information which has to be communicated according to a Court order or decision (see CoA 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025, Kodak v Fujifilm, para. 45). R. 262A RoP applies at least mutatis mutandis.
The CoA decided that a 262.2 RoP-application for confidentiality from the public had no implicit limitiation on the publication of that information by the other party. In order to prevent the other party to make information public that is subject to a 262.2 RoP application, the party must apply for an order under 262A RoP.
Stichwörter
R. 262A RoP, Art. 67 UPCA, R. 191 RoP
Communication of confidential information due to a court order or decision