2025-12-18 - CD Paris - Belparts Group et al. v. Imi Hydronic Engineering et al. - UPC_CFI_104/2025 and UPC_CFI_364/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_104/2025 and UPC_CFI_364/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
Art:
Order
Parteien:
IMI Hydronic Engineering Deutschland GmbH v. Belparts Group N.V.

Kernaussage: Security for costs request dismissed in revocation action with counterclaim for infringement.

2025-12-18 - CD Paris - Belparts Group et al. v. Imi Hydronic Engineering et al. - UPC_CFI_104/2025 and UPC_CFI_364/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat• Order
📅2025-12-18
🔢UPC_CFI_104/2025 and UPC_CFI_364/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_104/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
IMI Hydronic Engineering Deutschland GmbH
Clemens BAUER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Belparts Group N.V.
Florian HENKE
UPC_CFI_364/2025
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Belparts Group N.V.
Florian HENKE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
IMI Hydronic Engineering Deutschland GmbH
Clemens BAUER
📋n/A
⚖️Counterclaim for revocation
🌐English

routine
Security for costs request dismissed in revocation action with counterclaim for infringement. The Paris CD applied the CoA AorticLab/Emboline principle: Art. 69(4) UPCA only allows security against the applicant (claimant). In a revocation action, the revocation claimant is the applicant. Whether the defendant in the counterclaim for infringement can request security under R. 158.1 RoP was left open.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren