2025-10-02 - LD Mannheim - Centripetal v. Palo Alto Networks - UPC_CFI_636/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_636/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Centripetal Ltd. v. Palo Alto Networks

Kernaussage: The Mannheim LD rejected Centripetal’s request for a penalty order against Palo Alto Networks for alleged non-compliance with a saisie order.

2025-10-02 - LD Mannheim - Centripetal v. Palo Alto Networks UPC_CFI_636/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-10-02
🔢UPC_CFI_636/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Centripetal Limited
Niclas GAJECK
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Henrik LEHMENT
📋n/A
⚖️Application Rop 333
🌐English

notable
The Mannheim LD rejected Centripetal’s request for a penalty order against Palo Alto Networks for alleged non-compliance with a saisie order. During the inspection of Palo Alto’s Munich sales office, no Next Generation Firewall hardware was found and the single sales person present had no access to the technical systems Centripetal wanted to monitor. The court held that a saisie order is limited to inspecting what is found at the premises — the defendant has only a passive obligation to tolerate the inspection, not an active obligation to set up systems, increase access rights, or bring hardware from other locations. Digital inspection is limited to what is accessible in ordinary business at the premises. The defendant’s refusal to arrange remote access from US headquarters did not constitute non-compliance.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren