2025-01-24 - LD Milan - Dainese v. Alpinestars
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Dainese S.p.A.
Kernaussage: The Milan LD granted Dainese's application under R.
2025-01-24 - LD Milan - Dainese
v.
Alpinestars
notable
The Milan LD granted Dainese's application under R. 262A RoP to protect the settlement agreement concluded with co-defendant Horizon Moto 95 within a partial withdrawal under R. 265 RoP. The court held that Art. 58 UPCA extends protection beyond trade secrets to confidential information generally, and found the entire agreement confidential because its very existence was strategically sensitive for procedural positioning vis-a-vis non-settling co-defendants. The confidentiality club was limited to lawyers (no numerical limit per R. 262A.6) plus one natural person per party, as the information was non-technical. Leave to appeal was granted on the basis that the law remains unsettled, and enforcement was deferred to allow time for appeal.