2025-08-27 - LD Mannheim - Lidl et al. v. Lidl et al.
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- Decathlon
Kernaussage: the court may, at its discretion, disregard not only unsolicited written submissions in addition to the regular written pleadings provided for in the RoP, but also the content of regular written pleadings that goes beyond the admissible content provided for in the RoP.
2025-08-27 - LD Mannheim - Lidl et al.
v.
Lidl et al.
the court may, at its discretion, disregard not only unsolicited written submissions in addition to the regular written pleadings provided for in the RoP, but also the content of regular written pleadings that goes beyond the admissible content provided for in the RoP.
notable
Mannheim LD disregarded 11 pages of defendants' rejoinder AA addressing validity of patent as granted, exceeding R. 32.3 scope. R. 9.2 extends to content within regular pleadings that exceeds admissible scope. R. 32.3 restricts rejoinder AA to matters raised in reply AA — even summaries impermissible as they give unfair advantage to party filing last submission.
Stichwörter
R. 9.2, R. 36 RoP