2025-08-19 - LD Mannheim - Wilus Institute Of Standards And Technology v. ASUS et al.

Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
ASUS Computer GmbH, ASUSTeK Italy S.r.l., ASUS France S.a.r.l., ASUS Europe B.V., Ninepoint GmbH

Kernaussage: Request for the extension of the time period for the SoD, in the event of a request pursuant to R.

2025-08-19 - LD Mannheim - Wilus Institute Of Standards And Technology v. ASUS et al.
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Application Order
📅2025-08-19
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology, Inc.
Oliver Jan JÜNGST
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.
ASUS Computer GmbH
ASUS France S.a.r.l.
ASUSTeK Italy S.r.l.
ASUS Europe B.V.
Ninepoint GmbH
Holger STRATMANN
📋ORD_34904/2025
⚖️Generic application
🌐English

Request for the extension of the time period for the SoD, in the event of a request pursuant to R. 262A RoP regarding the SoC

notable
The Mannheim LD partially granted defendants' request for an extension of the SoD deadline in connection with pending R. 262A confidentiality proceedings regarding a key exhibit. The JR confirmed established Mannheim LD case law that time periods run regardless of when a party obtains access to unredacted materials, but the affected party is entitled to a compensatory extension corresponding to the period of restricted access. Only a one-week extension was justified because the exhibit related to a minor part of the SoC, the key standing assertions were already in the unredacted SoC, and defendants had delayed raising the access issue for over six weeks after service. The order cited both Mannheim LD precedent (Panasonic v Xiaomi) and CoA authority (Lionra v Cisco, Sanofi v Amgen).
Stichwörter
R. 9.3(a) RoP, R. 262A RoP

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren