2025-06-05 - CD Milan - Insulet v. EOFLOW - UPC_CFI_477/2025

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_477/2025
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division- Section
Art:
Application Order
Parteien:
EOFLOW v. Insulet

Kernaussage: In principle, the costs of the proceedings are not covered by confidentiality under Rule 262A RoP or by the attorney-client privilege unless they are specifically indicative of the company's financial capacity, its commercial strategy, or the importance of the patent as a corpor…

2025-06-05 - CD Milan - Insulet v. EOFLOW - UPC_CFI_477/2025
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_477/2025 (Sie lesen diesen hier) Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_477/2025
🏛️Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division- Section• Application Order
📅2025-06-05
🔢UPC_CFI_477/2025
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Insulet Corporation
Marc GRUNWALD
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
Ronald Mirko WEINERT
📋ORD_26828/2025
⚖️Application RoP262A
🌐English

In principle, the costs of the proceedings are not covered by confidentiality under Rule 262A RoP or by the attorney-client privilege unless they are specifically indicative of the company's financial capacity, its commercial strategy, or the importance of the patent as a corporate asset.

The Milan Central Division ordered that details regarding the invoice for legal representation were to be kept confidential since they were indicative of the Defendant's financial capacity and commercial strategy. The Court went into detail regarding the purpose of the UPC's confidentiality rules. The order was published twice.
Stichwörter
legal costs

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren