2025-05-09 - LD Hamburg - Jingao Solar v. Astronergy et al. - UPC_CFI_429/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_429/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Jingao Solar v. Astronergy, Chint
Kernaussage: There is no obligation to provide security if the obligation exists solely because the plaintiff is based in the People's Republic of China; Panel review of cost order, R.
2025-05-09 - LD Hamburg - Jingao Solar
v.
Astronergy et al. - UPC_CFI_429/2024
There is no obligation to provide security if the obligation exists solely because the plaintiff is based in the People's Republic of China; Panel review of cost order, R. 333, 158 RoP;
In this panel review order, the Hamburg Local Division confirmed the judge-rapporteur's order rejecting a security for the Claimant solely based on the fact the Claimant is based in China. The Court explicitly confirmed its position, although it is the opposite of what the Local Division Munich had stated in their order in a parallel case involving the same parties.
Stichwörter
security for cost, panel review