2025-05-08 - LD Munich - Sanofi et al. v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_147/2024; UPC_CFI_374/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_147/2024; UPC_CFI_374/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Sanofi v. Reddy

Kernaussage: 1.

2025-05-08 - LD Munich - Sanofi et al. v. Sanofi et al. - UPC_CFI_147/2024; UPC_CFI_374/2024
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Aktenzeichen

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-05-08
🔢UPC_CFI_147/2024; UPC_CFI_374/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
UPC_CFI_146/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Sanofi Mature IP
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
Sanofi-Aventis France
Sanofi-Aventis GmbH
Sanofi Belgium
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi S.r.l.
Sanofi B.V.
Sanofi - Produtos Farmaceuticos Lda
Sanofi AB
Sanofi A/S
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
STADAPHARM GmbH
STADA Arzneimittel AG
STADA Nordic ApS
Konstantin SCHALLMOSER
UPC_CFI_147/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Sanofi Mature IP
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
Sanofi-Aventis France
Sanofi-Aventis GmbH
Sanofi Belgium
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi S.r.l.
Sanofi B.V.
Sanofi - Produtos Farmaceuticos Lda
Sanofi AB
Sanofi A/S
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Reddy Pharma SAS
betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH
Dr Reddy's Srl
Christian MEYER
UPC_CFI_148/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Sanofi Mature IP
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
Sanofi-Aventis France
Sanofi-Aventis GmbH
Sanofi Belgium
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi S.r.l.
Sanofi B.V.
Sanofi - Produtos Farmaceuticos Lda
Sanofi AB
Sanofi A/S
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Zentiva France
Zentiva Pharma GmbH
Zentiva, k.s.
Anja LUNZE
UPC_CFI_374/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH
Dr Reddy's Srl
Reddy Pharma SAS
Christian MEYER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi Mature IP
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
UPC_CFI_463/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Accord Healthcare S.L.U.
Accord Healthcare B.V.
Accord Healthcare GmbH
Accord Healthcare Italia Srl
Accord Healthcare, Unipessoal Lda.
Accord Healthcare BV
Accord Healthcare AB
Jules FABRE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi Mature IP
Frédéric CHEVALLIER
UPC_CFI_496/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
STADA Arzneimittel AG
STADA Nordic ApS
STADAPHARM GmbH
Konstantin SCHALLMOSER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Sanofi Mature IP
Sanofi B.V.
Sanofi S.r.l.
Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
Sanofi-Aventis France
Sanofi Belgium
Sanofi-Aventis GmbH
Sanofi - Produtos Farmaceuticos Lda
Sanofi AB
Sanofi A/S
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
UPC_CFI_503/2024
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Zentiva, k.s.
Zentiva Pharma GmbH
Zentiva France
Anja LUNZE
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
Sanofi Mature IP
Agathe MICHEL-DE CAZOTTE
📋ORD_10067/2025
⚖️Generic Order
🌐English

1. The judge-rapporteur informs the parties that the preliminary objections will be dealt with in the main proceedings. 2. The judge-rapporteur puts the remaining pending requests to the panel for decision following the main oral hearing. 3. The defendants are invited to file the rejoinder to the reply to the defence (Rule 29 (d) RoP) within two months from today. 4. The claimants are invited to file a brief according to Rule 29 (2) RoP within one month following the filing of the rejoinder to the reply to the defence. 5. The written procedure will be closed on 8 August 2025. 6. The date for the Interim Conference scheduled for 17 July 2025 is confirmed. The IC will primarily focus on the outcome of the appeal proceedings at the BoA of the EPO. 7. Another (the main) Interim Conference is set for 12 September 2025, 10.00 a.m., via videoconference. 8. The dates for the oral hearing scheduled for 14-17 October 2025 are confirmed. 9. The parties are summoned to the above-mentioned hearings and interim conferences.

The Munich Local Division issued this 60 page procedural order for 4 parallel case-groups with different defendant groups. The Court summarized the parties' positions, ordered that the preliminary objections would be decided together with the main decision, scheduled the end of the written proceedings and the interim conference. The order was published four times for the defendant groups.
Stichwörter
Rule 20.2 RoP, Rule 332 (d) RoP, case management

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren