2025-05-08 - LD Brussels - Barco v. Yealink Network Technology - UPC_CFI_582/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_582/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- Yealink v. Barco
Kernaussage: 1.
2025-05-08 - LD Brussels - Barco
v.
Yealink Network Technology - UPC_CFI_582/2024
1. The circumstances listed in R. 353 RoP for rectification of a decision or order are exhaustive in nature. Rectification may be requested for (i) clerical errors, (ii) miscalculations, and (iii) obvious omissions in the decision or order. 2. A decision/order of the Court should be read and interpreted as a whole, the motivational part of the decision/order (grounds) being as much a part of the decision/order as its substantive part (decision). 3. The notion “interim award” does not require that another award should follow such “interim award” to be executable.
The Brussels Local Division dismissed an application for the rectification of an order, stating that there was no error in the order as it should be interpreted as a whole and in consideration of the motivational part. Finally, "interim award" did not require that another award should follow for the order to be executable.
Stichwörter
R. 353 RoP, Application for rectification, Interim award of costs, R. 211 (d) RoP