2024-08-12 - LD Munich - NEC v. TCL - UPC_CFI_153/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_153/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
TCL, TCT v. NEC Corporation

Kernaussage: Acting as a representative of a party in a particular proceeding in accordance with Rule 8.

2024-08-12 - LD Munich - NEC v. TCL - UPC_CFI_153/2024
🏛️Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2024-08-12
🔢UPC_CFI_153/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
NEC Corporation
Tilman MUELLER
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
TCL Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd.
TCT Mobile Germany GmbH
TCT Mobile Europe SAS
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.
TCL Operations Polska Sp. Z.o.o,
TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.
Ralph NACK
📋ORD_42985/2024
⚖️Application Rop 333
🌐English

Acting as a representative of a party in a particular proceeding in accordance with Rule 8.1 and .2 RoP requires that the lawyer has the authority from the party to act as counsel on behalf of the latter. The authority to act as counsel is subject of Civil law. According to Rule 285.1 RoP a representative is deemed to be acting under such authority as long as his representative powers are not challenged. Neither the CMS nor any other software establishes the status of representative. The CMS does not exclude any person as a representative because this person is not named in the CMS for a particular proceeding.

This court order rejects the request for a panel review regarding a granted deadline extension; the applicant's objections regarding correct representation were deemed irrelevant.
Stichwörter
Extension of time periods, Extension of time periods

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren