2024-08-21 - CD Paris - Kinexon Sports Media v. Ballinno - UPC_CFI_230/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_230/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat
- Art:
- Application Order
- Parteien:
- Ballinno B.V. vs Kinexon Sports
Kernaussage: An appeal against the denial of provisional measures does generally not justify a stay of revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 295(m) RoP.
2024-08-21 - CD Paris - Kinexon Sports Media
v.
Ballinno - UPC_CFI_230/2024
An appeal against the denial of provisional measures does generally not justify a stay of revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 295(m) RoP. Rule 295(m) RoP must be applied and interpreted in accordance with the principle according to which proceedings must be conducted in a way which will normally allow the final oral hearing at first instance to take place within one year.
The court dismissed the application to stay the proceedings.
Stichwörter
Rule 295(m)