2024-08-16 - LD Lisbon - Ericsson v. ASUS et al. - UPC_CFI_317/2024
- Aktenzeichen:
- UPC_CFI_317/2024
- Datum:
- Spruchkörper:
- Court of First Instance - Lisbon (PT) Local Division
- Art:
- Order
- Parteien:
- Arvato Netherlands B.V., Digital River Ireland Ltd., ASUSTek Computer Inc. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Kernaussage: 1.
2024-08-16 - LD Lisbon - Ericsson
v.
ASUS et al. - UPC_CFI_317/2024
1. R. 13.1(h) RoP requires the indication of the actions before other courts or authorities related to the patent for the Court to assess their relevance within the UPC proceedings.
2. The examination to be made by the Registry according to R. 16.2 and 13.1(h) RoP is formal: whether any information at all has been provided. The Registry has no obligation to verify that the information provided is correct.
3. R. 13.1(h) RoP does not provide legal support for requesting that the Applicant submits to the proceedings copies of all prior art relied on in all of the related proceedings, together with pleadings, statements of case, and expert reports from such proceedings.
The court ordered the applicant to comply with Rule 13(h) and supply additional information about prior proceedings
Stichwörter
Compliance, R. 13.1(h) RoP