2025-03-11 - LD Mannheim - Hurom v. NUC Electronics - UPC_CFI_162/2024

Aktenzeichen:
UPC_CFI_162/2024
Datum:
Spruchkörper:
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Art:
Order
Parteien:
Hurom Co., Ltd. v. NUC Electronics Co., Ltd

Kernaussage: The Mannheim LD delivered a landmark infringement decision establishing a comprehensive framework for the intertemporal applicability of UPCA substantive law to traditional European bundle patents.

2025-03-11 - LD Mannheim - Hurom v. NUC Electronics - UPC_CFI_162/2024
🗂️Nur Fallakte
Eine Entscheidung, mehrere Registereinträge

Das Gericht hat diese Verfahren zusammen entschieden und dasselbe Dokument in jedem davon eingestellt. Jeder Eintrag unten ist ein eigener vollwertiger Registereintrag.

  • UPC_CFI_162/2024 Text zuerst hier gespeichert
  • UPC_CFI_162/2024 (Sie lesen diesen hier)
🏛️Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division• Order
📅2025-03-11
🔢UPC_CFI_162/2024
Parteien & Vertreter
Kläger / Berufungsführer
Hurom Co., Ltd.
Klaus HAFT
Beklagter / Berufungsbeklagter
NUC Electronics Co., Ltd
Martin MOMTSCHILOW
⚖️Infringement
🌐English

landmark
The Mannheim LD delivered a landmark infringement decision establishing a comprehensive framework for the intertemporal applicability of UPCA substantive law to traditional European bundle patents. The court held: (1) UPCA substantive law applies to acts committed after 1 June 2023; (2) national law applies to pre-UPCA acts due to the prohibition of retroactivity under the VCLT and EU law; (3) for ongoing acts crossing 1 June 2023, UPCA applies from a normative (not formalistic) perspective, with a reservation allowing parties to invoke favorable national law for pre-UPCA acts. The court also held that Art. 26 Brussels Ia Reg. prevails over R. 19.7 RoP for jurisdictional objection timing, that Art. 34 UPCA is procedural (scope of decisions) not substantive, and that acts outside UPC territory (here: Korea) constituting support of infringement with control over distribution amount to perpetration under Art. 25 UPCA. Infringement of claim 1 was found; comprehensive remedies were granted across five UPCA states.

Entscheidung teilen

Weitere Navigation
Entscheidungen
Rechtstexte
Analysen

Zu Sammlung hinzufügen

0 Einträge hinzufügen zu:

Anmeldung

Registrieren