This is Rule 275 from the UPCRoP (Verfahrensordnung des Einheitlichen Patentgerichts), which is part of the legal framework governing the Unified Patent Court in Europe.
Where service in accordance with Section 1 or 2 could not be effected the Court on an application by the claimant that there is a good reason to authorise service by a method or at a place not otherwise permitted by this Chapter, the Court may by way of order permit service by an alternative method or at an alternative place.
On a reasoned request by the claimant, the Court may order that steps already taken to bring the Statement of claim to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method or at an alternative place is good service.
An order under this rule shall specify:
the method or place of service;
the date on which the Statement of claim is deemed served; and
the period for filing the Statement of defence.
No order for alternative service under this Rule shall be made permitting service in a manner that is contrary to the law of the state where service is to be effected.
This legal text is from the official UPCRoP framework governing the Unified Patent Court.
Reference: UPCRoP 275 (Rule 275)
Auf Englisch angezeigt — diese Vorschrift liegt im Korpus nicht auf Deutsch vor.
Gekürzt — der vollständige Text steht auf der Gesetzesseite.
Zur Gesetzesseite